konannfriends wrote: Well if that is in fact the case and you people who want 4* to completely dominate 3* then there has to be a change to PvP Because 3* users who have yo fight "real" 4 stars at there max level are at a huge disadvantage. If 4* are going to just outright crush 3* then I should never have to fight a team with any 4* over level 210 until I get a 4* of my own.
Chirus wrote: konannfriends wrote: Well if that is in fact the case and you people who want 4* to completely dominate 3* then there has to be a change to PvP Because 3* users who have yo fight "real" 4 stars at there max level are at a huge disadvantage. If 4* are going to just outright crush 3* then I should never have to fight a team with any 4* over level 210 until I get a 4* of my own. The question isn't should 4 stars be unbeatable by 3 stars. It's should they be better? There are more than enough people who reach 1k points without the aid of a 4 star (thus implying they can also take on max 4 star rosters since this is almost all you see at that point range). It's harder, but it can be done. Also as it was stated by many others so far, how much better they should be than 3 stars is under much heated debate, but that's not the question that's being asked here.
babinro wrote: Should we be a lot more upset that the 4* field looks so terrible then?
Spiritclaw wrote: And so, the moral of the story: Buff Invisible Woman again?